What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Australia and Chile?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chile?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Australia vs Chile: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP

Australia

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Chile

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Australia rank

113th

Chile rank

111th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time

Australia
Chile

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Australia, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 113th and Chile ranks 111th of 173 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Australia	Chile	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Australia
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Australia
2020s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Australia or Chile?: Chile, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Australia and Chile?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chile?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Australia and Chile rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?: Australia ranks 113th and Chile ranks 111th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Chile: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/chile/">Australia vs Chile: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 173 places, 3,890 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.