What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Antigua and Barbuda and New Caledonia?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and New Caledonia?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Antigua and Barbuda vs New Caledonia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP

Antigua and Barbuda

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2024

New Caledonia

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Antigua and Barbuda rank

39th

New Caledonia rank

40th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP over time

Antigua and Barbuda
New Caledonia

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 39th and New Caledonia ranks 40th of 173 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Antigua and Barbuda	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Antigua and Barbuda
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Antigua and Barbuda
2020s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp, Antigua and Barbuda or New Caledonia?: Antigua and Barbuda, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp between Antigua and Barbuda and New Caledonia?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and New Caledonia?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and New Caledonia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?: Antigua and Barbuda ranks 39th and New Caledonia ranks 40th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs New Caledonia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/antigua-and-barbuda/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-unit-of-gdp/antigua-and-barbuda/new-caledonia/">Antigua and Barbuda vs New Caledonia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 173 places, 3,890 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.