What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Portugal and United States?

0.0004 hectares per square kilometre, with United States ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and United States?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Portugal vs United States: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Portugal

0.005 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

United States

0.0054 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Portugal rank

37th

United States rank

35th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Portugal
United States

How they compare

United States currently reports 0.0054 hectares per square kilometre against 0.005 hectares per square kilometre in Portugal, a difference of 0.0004 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes United States's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was United States ahead.

Portugal ranks 37th and United States ranks 35th of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 1 and United States in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Portugal	United States	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0054 hectares per square kilometre	0.0099 hectares per square kilometre	0.0045 hectares per square kilometre	United States
2010s	0.0069 hectares per square kilometre	0.006 hectares per square kilometre	0.0009 hectares per square kilometre	Portugal
2020s	0.0059 hectares per square kilometre	0.0062 hectares per square kilometre	0.0003 hectares per square kilometre	United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Portugal or United States?: United States, at 0.0054 hectares per square kilometre against 0.005 hectares per square kilometre in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Portugal and United States?: 0.0004 hectares per square kilometre, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and United States?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Portugal and United States rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Portugal ranks 37th and United States ranks 35th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs United States: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/portugal/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/portugal/united-states/">Portugal vs United States: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.