What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Philippines and Solomon Islands?

0.0001 hectares per square kilometre, with Solomon Islands ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Solomon Islands?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Philippines vs Solomon Islands: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Philippines

0.0018 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Solomon Islands

0.0019 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Philippines rank

77th

Solomon Islands rank

75th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Philippines
Solomon Islands

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 0.0019 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0018 hectares per square kilometre in Philippines, a difference of 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Philippines ahead.

Philippines ranks 77th and Solomon Islands ranks 75th of 176 countries.

Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Philippines	Solomon Islands	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0019 hectares per square kilometre	0.0026 hectares per square kilometre	0.0007 hectares per square kilometre	Solomon Islands
2010s	0.0027 hectares per square kilometre	0.0038 hectares per square kilometre	0.0011 hectares per square kilometre	Solomon Islands
2020s	0.002 hectares per square kilometre	0.002 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Philippines or Solomon Islands?: Solomon Islands, at 0.0019 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0018 hectares per square kilometre in Philippines as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Philippines and Solomon Islands?: 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Solomon Islands?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Philippines and Solomon Islands rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Philippines ranks 77th and Solomon Islands ranks 75th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Solomon Islands: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/philippines/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/philippines/solomon-islands/">Philippines vs Solomon Islands: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.