How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and San Marino?

9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Panama vs San Marino: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Panama

0.0028 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

San Marino

0.0028 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Panama rank

59th

San Marino rank

60th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Panama
San Marino

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.0028 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0028 hectares per square kilometre in San Marino, a difference of 0 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 59th and San Marino ranks 60th of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 2 and San Marino in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Panama	San Marino	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0046 hectares per square kilometre	0.0015 hectares per square kilometre	0.0031 hectares per square kilometre	Panama
2010s	0.0036 hectares per square kilometre	0.0043 hectares per square kilometre	0.0007 hectares per square kilometre	San Marino
2020s	0.0028 hectares per square kilometre	0.0028 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Panama or San Marino?: Panama, at 0.0028 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0028 hectares per square kilometre in San Marino as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Panama and San Marino?: 0 hectares per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and San Marino?: 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Panama and San Marino rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Panama ranks 59th and San Marino ranks 60th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs San Marino: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/panama/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/panama/san-marino/">Panama vs San Marino: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.