How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Zimbabwe?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Nicaragua vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Nicaragua

0.0001 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0.0001 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Nicaragua rank

143rd

Zimbabwe rank

146th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Nicaragua
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 146th of 176 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Nicaragua	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0005 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	Nicaragua
2010s	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	0.0003 hectares per square kilometre	Nicaragua
2020s	0.0002 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Nicaragua or Zimbabwe?: Nicaragua, at 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Nicaragua and Zimbabwe?: 0 hectares per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Zimbabwe?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Zimbabwe rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Nicaragua ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 146th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/zimbabwe/">Nicaragua vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.