What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Nicaragua and United Kingdom?

0.0001 hectares per square kilometre, with United Kingdom ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and United Kingdom?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Nicaragua vs United Kingdom: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Nicaragua

0.0001 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

United Kingdom

0.0002 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Nicaragua rank

143rd

United Kingdom rank

141st

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Nicaragua
United Kingdom

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 0.0002 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 1.3 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 143rd and United Kingdom ranks 141st of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Nicaragua	United Kingdom	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0005 hectares per square kilometre	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	Nicaragua
2010s	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	United Kingdom
2020s	0.0002 hectares per square kilometre	0.0002 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Nicaragua or United Kingdom?: United Kingdom, at 0.0002 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Nicaragua and United Kingdom?: 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and United Kingdom?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and United Kingdom rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Nicaragua ranks 143rd and United Kingdom ranks 141st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs United Kingdom: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/united-kingdom/">Nicaragua vs United Kingdom: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.