How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and East Timor?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mexico vs East Timor: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Mexico

0.0012 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

East Timor

0.0011 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Mexico rank

87th

East Timor rank

89th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Mexico
East Timor

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 0.0012 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0011 hectares per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times East Timor's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 87th and East Timor ranks 89th of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mexico	East Timor	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0019 hectares per square kilometre	0.0006 hectares per square kilometre	0.0013 hectares per square kilometre	Mexico
2010s	0.0011 hectares per square kilometre	0.0016 hectares per square kilometre	0.0005 hectares per square kilometre	East Timor
2020s	0.001 hectares per square kilometre	0.001 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Mexico or East Timor?: Mexico, at 0.0012 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0011 hectares per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Mexico and East Timor?: 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and East Timor?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Mexico and East Timor rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Mexico ranks 87th and East Timor ranks 89th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs East Timor: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/mexico/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/mexico/timor-leste/">Mexico vs East Timor: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.