How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and New Caledonia?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malawi vs New Caledonia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Malawi

0.0007 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

New Caledonia

0.0006 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Malawi rank

113th

New Caledonia rank

115th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Malawi
New Caledonia

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0007 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0006 hectares per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Malawi ranks 113th and New Caledonia ranks 115th of 176 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malawi	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0003 hectares per square kilometre	0.0036 hectares per square kilometre	0.0033 hectares per square kilometre	New Caledonia
2010s	0.0002 hectares per square kilometre	0.0025 hectares per square kilometre	0.0023 hectares per square kilometre	New Caledonia
2020s	0.0003 hectares per square kilometre	0.0008 hectares per square kilometre	0.0005 hectares per square kilometre	New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Malawi or New Caledonia?: Malawi, at 0.0007 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0006 hectares per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Malawi and New Caledonia?: 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and New Caledonia?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Malawi and New Caledonia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Malawi ranks 113th and New Caledonia ranks 115th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs New Caledonia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/malawi/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/malawi/new-caledonia/">Malawi vs New Caledonia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.