How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Rwanda?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Luxembourg vs Rwanda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Luxembourg

0.0018 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Rwanda

0.0016 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Luxembourg rank

78th

Rwanda rank

80th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Luxembourg
Rwanda

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 0.0018 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0016 hectares per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0002 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 78th and Rwanda ranks 80th of 176 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Luxembourg	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0029 hectares per square kilometre	0.0016 hectares per square kilometre	0.0013 hectares per square kilometre	Luxembourg
2010s	0.0026 hectares per square kilometre	0.0019 hectares per square kilometre	0.0007 hectares per square kilometre	Luxembourg
2020s	0.0022 hectares per square kilometre	0.0014 hectares per square kilometre	0.0008 hectares per square kilometre	Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Luxembourg or Rwanda?: Luxembourg, at 0.0018 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0016 hectares per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Luxembourg and Rwanda?: 0.0002 hectares per square kilometre, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Rwanda?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Luxembourg and Rwanda rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Luxembourg ranks 78th and Rwanda ranks 80th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Luxembourg vs Rwanda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/luxembourg/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/luxembourg/rwanda/">Luxembourg vs Rwanda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.