How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Namibia?

7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Libya vs Namibia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Libya

0 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Namibia

0 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Libya rank

167th

Namibia rank

166th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Libya
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 hectares per square kilometre against 0 hectares per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 0 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 167th and Namibia ranks 166th of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Libya	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	Libya
2010s	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	Namibia
2020s	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Libya or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0 hectares per square kilometre against 0 hectares per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Libya and Namibia?: 0 hectares per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Namibia?: 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Libya and Namibia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Libya ranks 167th and Namibia ranks 166th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Namibia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/">Libya vs Namibia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.