How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Nepal?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Liberia vs Nepal: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Liberia

0.0036 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Nepal

0.0036 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Liberia rank

48th

Nepal rank

47th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Liberia
Nepal

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.0036 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0036 hectares per square kilometre in Liberia, a difference of 0 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Liberia ahead.

Liberia ranks 48th and Nepal ranks 47th of 176 countries.

Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Liberia	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0042 hectares per square kilometre	0.0013 hectares per square kilometre	0.003 hectares per square kilometre	Liberia
2010s	0.0068 hectares per square kilometre	0.0021 hectares per square kilometre	0.0047 hectares per square kilometre	Liberia
2020s	0.0047 hectares per square kilometre	0.0043 hectares per square kilometre	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Liberia or Nepal?: Nepal, at 0.0036 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0036 hectares per square kilometre in Liberia as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Liberia and Nepal?: 0 hectares per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Nepal?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Liberia and Nepal rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Liberia ranks 48th and Nepal ranks 47th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs Nepal: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/liberia/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/liberia/nepal/">Liberia vs Nepal: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.