How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Rwanda?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Rwanda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Latvia

0.0015 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Rwanda

0.0016 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

83rd

Rwanda rank

80th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Latvia
Rwanda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0016 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0015 hectares per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Rwanda ahead.

Latvia ranks 83rd and Rwanda ranks 80th of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0016 hectares per square kilometre	0.0016 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	Latvia
2010s	0.0013 hectares per square kilometre	0.0019 hectares per square kilometre	0.0005 hectares per square kilometre	Rwanda
2020s	0.002 hectares per square kilometre	0.0014 hectares per square kilometre	0.0007 hectares per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Latvia or Rwanda?: Rwanda, at 0.0016 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0015 hectares per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Latvia and Rwanda?: 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Rwanda?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Rwanda rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Latvia ranks 83rd and Rwanda ranks 80th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Rwanda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/latvia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/latvia/rwanda/">Latvia vs Rwanda: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.