How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?

8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Kyrgyzstan

0 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Namibia

0 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Kyrgyzstan rank

165th

Namibia rank

166th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Kyrgyzstan
Namibia

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0 hectares per square kilometre against 0 hectares per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.8 times Namibia's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 165th and Namibia ranks 166th of 176 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Kyrgyzstan	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	Kyrgyzstan
2010s	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	Kyrgyzstan
2020s	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Kyrgyzstan or Namibia?: Kyrgyzstan, at 0 hectares per square kilometre against 0 hectares per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?: 0 hectares per square kilometre, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?: 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Namibia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Kyrgyzstan ranks 165th and Namibia ranks 166th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/kyrgyz-republic/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/kyrgyz-republic/namibia/">Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.