North Korea vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

North Korea
0.0001 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0001 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
North Korea rank
149th
Zimbabwe rank
146th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

  • North Korea
  • Zimbabwe
0000.001200120122023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre in North Korea, a difference of 0 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times North Korea's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was North Korea ahead.

North Korea ranks 149th and Zimbabwe ranks 146th of 176 countries.

North Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Korea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0002 hectares per square kilometre 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre North Korea
2010s 0.0002 hectares per square kilometre 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre North Korea
2020s 0.0003 hectares per square kilometre 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre 0.0002 hectares per square kilometre North Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, North Korea or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre in North Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between North Korea and Zimbabwe?
0 hectares per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Korea and Zimbabwe?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do North Korea and Zimbabwe rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?
North Korea ranks 149th and Zimbabwe ranks 146th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Korea vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/korea-dem-people-s-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/korea-dem-people-s-rep/zimbabwe/">North Korea vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.