How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Namibia?

11 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iran vs Namibia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Iran

0 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Namibia

0 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Iran rank

169th

Namibia rank

166th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Iran
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 hectares per square kilometre against 0 hectares per square kilometre in Iran, a difference of 0 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 2.6 times Iran's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Iran ahead.

Iran ranks 169th and Namibia ranks 166th of 176 countries.

Iran has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iran	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	Iran
2010s	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	Iran
2020s	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	Iran

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Iran or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0 hectares per square kilometre against 0 hectares per square kilometre in Iran as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Iran and Namibia?: 0 hectares per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Namibia?: 11 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Iran and Namibia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Iran ranks 169th and Namibia ranks 166th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran vs Namibia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/iran-islamic-rep/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/iran-islamic-rep/namibia/">Iran vs Namibia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.