Guinea-Bissau vs Suriname: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau
0.0019 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0021 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
74th
Suriname rank
71st

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Suriname
00.0020.0040.0060.008200120122023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0021 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0019 hectares per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0002 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 74th and Suriname ranks 71st of 176 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Suriname Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0017 hectares per square kilometre 0.001 hectares per square kilometre 0.0006 hectares per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.0021 hectares per square kilometre 0.0013 hectares per square kilometre 0.0008 hectares per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.002 hectares per square kilometre 0.001 hectares per square kilometre 0.001 hectares per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.0021 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0019 hectares per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and Suriname?
0.0002 hectares per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Suriname?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Suriname rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 74th and Suriname ranks 71st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Suriname: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/suriname/">Guinea-Bissau vs Suriname: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.