How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Serbia?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guinea-Bissau vs Serbia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau

0.0019 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Serbia

0.0021 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Guinea-Bissau rank

74th

Serbia rank

72nd

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Guinea-Bissau
Serbia

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 0.0021 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0019 hectares per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0002 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 74th and Serbia ranks 72nd of 176 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guinea-Bissau	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0026 hectares per square kilometre	0.0005 hectares per square kilometre	0.002 hectares per square kilometre	Guinea-Bissau
2010s	0.0021 hectares per square kilometre	0.0008 hectares per square kilometre	0.0013 hectares per square kilometre	Guinea-Bissau
2020s	0.002 hectares per square kilometre	0.0013 hectares per square kilometre	0.0007 hectares per square kilometre	Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or Serbia?: Serbia, at 0.0021 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0019 hectares per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and Serbia?: 0.0002 hectares per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Serbia?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Serbia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Guinea-Bissau ranks 74th and Serbia ranks 72nd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Serbia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/serbia/">Guinea-Bissau vs Serbia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.