What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Liechtenstein?

0.0003 hectares per square kilometre, with Liechtenstein ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Liechtenstein?

20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Equatorial Guinea vs Liechtenstein: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea

0.0086 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Liechtenstein

0.0089 hectares per square kilometre

in 2022

Equatorial Guinea rank

23rd

Liechtenstein rank

22nd

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Equatorial Guinea
Liechtenstein

How they compare

Liechtenstein currently reports 0.0089 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0086 hectares per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0003 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 23rd and Liechtenstein ranks 22nd of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Liechtenstein in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Equatorial Guinea	Liechtenstein	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0146 hectares per square kilometre	0.016 hectares per square kilometre	0.0014 hectares per square kilometre	Liechtenstein
2010s	0.0229 hectares per square kilometre	0.0132 hectares per square kilometre	0.0097 hectares per square kilometre	Equatorial Guinea
2020s	0.0074 hectares per square kilometre	0.0076 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	Liechtenstein

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Liechtenstein?: Liechtenstein, at 0.0089 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0086 hectares per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2022.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Liechtenstein?: 0.0003 hectares per square kilometre, with Liechtenstein ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Liechtenstein?: 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Liechtenstein rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Equatorial Guinea ranks 23rd and Liechtenstein ranks 22nd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Liechtenstein: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/liechtenstein/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/liechtenstein/">Equatorial Guinea vs Liechtenstein: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.