Egypt vs Tajikistan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Egypt
0 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Tajikistan
0 hectares per square kilometre
in 2014
Egypt rank
161st
Tajikistan rank
164th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time
- Egypt
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0 hectares per square kilometre against 0 hectares per square kilometre in Tajikistan, a difference of 0 hectares per square kilometre.
That makes Egypt's figure about 2.3 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 161st and Tajikistan ranks 164th of 176 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per square kilometre | 0 hectares per square kilometre | 0 hectares per square kilometre | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per square kilometre | 0 hectares per square kilometre | 0 hectares per square kilometre | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Egypt or Tajikistan?
- Egypt, at 0 hectares per square kilometre against 0 hectares per square kilometre in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Egypt and Tajikistan?
- 0 hectares per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Tajikistan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.
- How do Egypt and Tajikistan rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?
- Egypt ranks 161st and Tajikistan ranks 164th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.