How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Peru?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cuba vs Peru: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Cuba

0.0003 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Peru

0.0003 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Cuba rank

128th

Peru rank

129th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Cuba
Peru

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.0003 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0003 hectares per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 0 hectares per square kilometre.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 128th and Peru ranks 129th of 176 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cuba	Peru	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0009 hectares per square kilometre	0.0003 hectares per square kilometre	0.0006 hectares per square kilometre	Cuba
2010s	0.001 hectares per square kilometre	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	0.0005 hectares per square kilometre	Cuba
2020s	0.0005 hectares per square kilometre	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	0.0002 hectares per square kilometre	Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Cuba or Peru?: Cuba, at 0.0003 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0003 hectares per square kilometre in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Cuba and Peru?: 0 hectares per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Peru?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Peru rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Cuba ranks 128th and Peru ranks 129th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Peru: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/cuba/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/cuba/peru/">Cuba vs Peru: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.