What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and Mauritius?

0.0009 hectares per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Mauritius?

14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cote d'Ivoire vs Mauritius: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Cote d'Ivoire

0.007 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Mauritius

0.0079 hectares per square kilometre

in 2014

Cote d'Ivoire rank

28th

Mauritius rank

25th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Cote d'Ivoire
Mauritius

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0079 hectares per square kilometre against 0.007 hectares per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.0009 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Cote d'Ivoire's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 28th and Mauritius ranks 25th of 176 countries.

Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cote d'Ivoire	Mauritius	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0056 hectares per square kilometre	0.0024 hectares per square kilometre	0.0032 hectares per square kilometre	Cote d'Ivoire
2010s	0.0078 hectares per square kilometre	0.0038 hectares per square kilometre	0.004 hectares per square kilometre	Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Cote d'Ivoire or Mauritius?: Mauritius, at 0.0079 hectares per square kilometre against 0.007 hectares per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2014.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and Mauritius?: 0.0009 hectares per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Mauritius?: 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Mauritius rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Cote d'Ivoire ranks 28th and Mauritius ranks 25th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Mauritius: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/mauritius/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Mauritius: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.