How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Curacao?

8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cote d'Ivoire vs Curacao: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Cote d'Ivoire

0.007 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Curacao

0.0071 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Cote d'Ivoire rank

28th

Curacao rank

27th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Cote d'Ivoire
Curacao

How they compare

Curacao currently reports 0.0071 hectares per square kilometre against 0.007 hectares per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 28th and Curacao ranks 27th of 176 countries.

Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cote d'Ivoire	Curacao	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0.0075 hectares per square kilometre	0.0009 hectares per square kilometre	0.0067 hectares per square kilometre	Cote d'Ivoire
2020s	0.0079 hectares per square kilometre	0.0056 hectares per square kilometre	0.0023 hectares per square kilometre	Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Cote d'Ivoire or Curacao?: Curacao, at 0.0071 hectares per square kilometre against 0.007 hectares per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and Curacao?: 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre, with Curacao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Curacao?: 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Curacao rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Cote d'Ivoire ranks 28th and Curacao ranks 27th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Curacao: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/curacao/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/curacao/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Curacao: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.