What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Sierra Leone?

0.0001 hectares per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Sierra Leone?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Costa Rica vs Sierra Leone: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Costa Rica

0.0023 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Sierra Leone

0.0022 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Costa Rica rank

69th

Sierra Leone rank

70th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Costa Rica
Sierra Leone

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.0023 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0022 hectares per square kilometre in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 69th and Sierra Leone ranks 70th of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Costa Rica	Sierra Leone	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0075 hectares per square kilometre	0.0067 hectares per square kilometre	0.0008 hectares per square kilometre	Costa Rica
2010s	0.0025 hectares per square kilometre	0.0074 hectares per square kilometre	0.005 hectares per square kilometre	Sierra Leone
2020s	0.0021 hectares per square kilometre	0.0039 hectares per square kilometre	0.0019 hectares per square kilometre	Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Sierra Leone?: Costa Rica, at 0.0023 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0022 hectares per square kilometre in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Sierra Leone?: 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Sierra Leone?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Sierra Leone rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Costa Rica ranks 69th and Sierra Leone ranks 70th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Sierra Leone: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/sierra-leone/">Costa Rica vs Sierra Leone: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.