How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uruguay?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Uruguay: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Congo

0.0007 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Uruguay

0.0007 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Congo rank

110th

Uruguay rank

112th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Congo
Uruguay

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0007 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0007 hectares per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 110th and Uruguay ranks 112th of 176 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Uruguay	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0011 hectares per square kilometre	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	0.0007 hectares per square kilometre	Congo
2010s	0.0015 hectares per square kilometre	0.0005 hectares per square kilometre	0.001 hectares per square kilometre	Congo
2020s	0.0006 hectares per square kilometre	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	0.0002 hectares per square kilometre	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Congo or Uruguay?: Congo, at 0.0007 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0007 hectares per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Congo and Uruguay?: 0 hectares per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uruguay?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Congo and Uruguay rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Congo ranks 110th and Uruguay ranks 112th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Uruguay: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/uruguay/">Congo vs Uruguay: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.