Democratic Republic of Congo vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Democratic Republic of Congo
0.0012 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0014 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
88th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
86th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.020.040.06200120122023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0014 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0012 hectares per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.0002 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.2 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 88th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 86th of 176 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0014 hectares per square kilometre 0.0265 hectares per square kilometre 0.0251 hectares per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0018 hectares per square kilometre 0.007 hectares per square kilometre 0.0052 hectares per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.0013 hectares per square kilometre 0.0073 hectares per square kilometre 0.006 hectares per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Democratic Republic of Congo or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0014 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0012 hectares per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Democratic Republic of Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0002 hectares per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 88th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 86th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.