How many years of comparable data are there for China and Comoros?

22 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China vs Comoros: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

China

0.0034 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Comoros

0.0035 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

China rank

51st

Comoros rank

49th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

China
Comoros

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 0.0035 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0034 hectares per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2001 it was China ahead.

China ranks 51st and Comoros ranks 49th of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Comoros in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	China	Comoros	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0016 hectares per square kilometre	0.0006 hectares per square kilometre	0.0011 hectares per square kilometre	China
2010s	0.0032 hectares per square kilometre	0.0047 hectares per square kilometre	0.0015 hectares per square kilometre	Comoros
2020s	0.0032 hectares per square kilometre	0.0046 hectares per square kilometre	0.0013 hectares per square kilometre	Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, China or Comoros?: Comoros, at 0.0035 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0034 hectares per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between China and Comoros?: 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Comoros?: 22 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do China and Comoros rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: China ranks 51st and Comoros ranks 49th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Comoros: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/china/comoros/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/china/comoros/">China vs Comoros: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.