How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malta?

5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2013.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Malta: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Chile

0.0004 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Malta

0.0004 hectares per square kilometre

in 2013

Chile rank

125th

Malta rank

124th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Chile
Malta

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.0004 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0004 hectares per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Malta ahead.

Chile ranks 125th and Malta ranks 124th of 176 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Malta	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	0.0012 hectares per square kilometre	0.0008 hectares per square kilometre	Malta
2010s	0.0005 hectares per square kilometre	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Chile or Malta?: Malta, at 0.0004 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0004 hectares per square kilometre in Chile as of 2013.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Chile and Malta?: 0 hectares per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malta?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2013.
How do Chile and Malta rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Chile ranks 125th and Malta ranks 124th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Malta: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/chile/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/chile/malta/">Chile vs Malta: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.