How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Fiji?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Fiji: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Chile

0.0004 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Fiji

0.0004 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile rank

125th

Fiji rank

127th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Chile
Fiji

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0004 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0004 hectares per square kilometre in Fiji, a difference of 0 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Fiji ahead.

Chile ranks 125th and Fiji ranks 127th of 176 countries.

Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Fiji	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	0.0008 hectares per square kilometre	0.0003 hectares per square kilometre	Fiji
2010s	0.0005 hectares per square kilometre	0.0015 hectares per square kilometre	0.001 hectares per square kilometre	Fiji
2020s	0.0005 hectares per square kilometre	0.0007 hectares per square kilometre	0.0002 hectares per square kilometre	Fiji

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Chile or Fiji?: Chile, at 0.0004 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0004 hectares per square kilometre in Fiji as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Chile and Fiji?: 0 hectares per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Fiji?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Chile and Fiji rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Chile ranks 125th and Fiji ranks 127th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Fiji: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/chile/fiji/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/chile/fiji/">Chile vs Fiji: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.