What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Cayman Islands and Maldives?

0.0244 hectares per square kilometre, with Cayman Islands ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Maldives?

15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cayman Islands vs Maldives: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Cayman Islands

0.0693 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Maldives

0.0449 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Cayman Islands rank

2nd

Maldives rank

4th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Cayman Islands
Maldives

How they compare

Cayman Islands currently reports 0.0693 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0449 hectares per square kilometre in Maldives, a difference of 0.0244 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Cayman Islands's figure about 1.5 times Maldives's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Cayman Islands has been ahead every year.

Cayman Islands ranks 2nd and Maldives ranks 4th of 176 countries.

Cayman Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cayman Islands	Maldives	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0628 hectares per square kilometre	0.0069 hectares per square kilometre	0.0559 hectares per square kilometre	Cayman Islands
2010s	0.07 hectares per square kilometre	0.009 hectares per square kilometre	0.061 hectares per square kilometre	Cayman Islands
2020s	0.0693 hectares per square kilometre	0.0449 hectares per square kilometre	0.0244 hectares per square kilometre	Cayman Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Cayman Islands or Maldives?: Cayman Islands, at 0.0693 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0449 hectares per square kilometre in Maldives as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Cayman Islands and Maldives?: 0.0244 hectares per square kilometre, with Cayman Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Maldives?: 15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Cayman Islands and Maldives rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Cayman Islands ranks 2nd and Maldives ranks 4th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Maldives: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/maldives/">Cayman Islands vs Maldives: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.