How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Ecuador?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cambodia vs Ecuador: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Cambodia

0.0008 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Ecuador

0.0008 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Cambodia rank

98th

Ecuador rank

99th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Cambodia
Ecuador

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 0.0008 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0008 hectares per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Ecuador ahead.

Cambodia ranks 98th and Ecuador ranks 99th of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cambodia	Ecuador	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.001 hectares per square kilometre	0.0016 hectares per square kilometre	0.0006 hectares per square kilometre	Ecuador
2010s	0.0015 hectares per square kilometre	0.0011 hectares per square kilometre	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	Cambodia
2020s	0.0008 hectares per square kilometre	0.0007 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Cambodia or Ecuador?: Cambodia, at 0.0008 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0008 hectares per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Cambodia and Ecuador?: 0 hectares per square kilometre, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Ecuador?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Ecuador rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Cambodia ranks 98th and Ecuador ranks 99th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Ecuador: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/ecuador/">Cambodia vs Ecuador: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.