How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Congo?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Brazil vs Congo: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Brazil

0.0007 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Congo

0.0007 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Brazil rank

108th

Congo rank

110th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Brazil
Congo

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.0007 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0007 hectares per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Congo ahead.

Brazil ranks 108th and Congo ranks 110th of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Brazil	Congo	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.001 hectares per square kilometre	0.0011 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	Congo
2010s	0.0011 hectares per square kilometre	0.0015 hectares per square kilometre	0.0003 hectares per square kilometre	Congo
2020s	0.0007 hectares per square kilometre	0.0006 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Brazil or Congo?: Brazil, at 0.0007 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0007 hectares per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Brazil and Congo?: 0 hectares per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Congo?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Congo rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Brazil ranks 108th and Congo ranks 110th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Congo: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/brazil/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/brazil/congo-rep/">Brazil vs Congo: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.