How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Cote d'Ivoire?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs Cote d'Ivoire: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Belgium

0.0069 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Cote d'Ivoire

0.007 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Belgium rank

29th

Cote d'Ivoire rank

28th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Belgium
Cote d'Ivoire

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 0.007 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0069 hectares per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Belgium ranks 29th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 28th of 176 countries.

Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belgium	Cote d'Ivoire	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0044 hectares per square kilometre	0.0056 hectares per square kilometre	0.0012 hectares per square kilometre	Cote d'Ivoire
2010s	0.0056 hectares per square kilometre	0.0098 hectares per square kilometre	0.0042 hectares per square kilometre	Cote d'Ivoire
2020s	0.0085 hectares per square kilometre	0.0086 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Belgium or Cote d'Ivoire?: Cote d'Ivoire, at 0.007 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0069 hectares per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Belgium and Cote d'Ivoire?: 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Cote d'Ivoire?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Belgium ranks 29th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 28th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Cote d'Ivoire: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/belgium/cote-d-ivoire/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/belgium/cote-d-ivoire/">Belgium vs Cote d'Ivoire: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.