Barbados vs El Salvador: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Barbados
0.0056 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
0.0062 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
34th
El Salvador rank
31st

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • El Salvador
00.010.020.03200120122023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.0062 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0056 hectares per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.0006 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was El Salvador ahead.

Barbados ranks 34th and El Salvador ranks 31st of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados El Salvador Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0061 hectares per square kilometre 0.0076 hectares per square kilometre 0.0015 hectares per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 0.0071 hectares per square kilometre 0.0062 hectares per square kilometre 0.0009 hectares per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.004 hectares per square kilometre 0.0057 hectares per square kilometre 0.0017 hectares per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Barbados or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at 0.0062 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0056 hectares per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Barbados and El Salvador?
0.0006 hectares per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and El Salvador?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Barbados and El Salvador rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 34th and El Salvador ranks 31st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs El Salvador: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/barbados/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/barbados/el-salvador/">Barbados vs El Salvador: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.