How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Mauritius?

14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bahamas vs Mauritius: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Bahamas

0.0082 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Mauritius

0.0079 hectares per square kilometre

in 2014

Bahamas rank

24th

Mauritius rank

25th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Bahamas
Mauritius

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 0.0082 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0079 hectares per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0003 hectares per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 24th and Mauritius ranks 25th of 176 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bahamas	Mauritius	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.019 hectares per square kilometre	0.0024 hectares per square kilometre	0.0166 hectares per square kilometre	Bahamas
2010s	0.0075 hectares per square kilometre	0.0038 hectares per square kilometre	0.0037 hectares per square kilometre	Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Bahamas or Mauritius?: Bahamas, at 0.0082 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0079 hectares per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Bahamas and Mauritius?: 0.0003 hectares per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Mauritius?: 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2014.
How do Bahamas and Mauritius rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Bahamas ranks 24th and Mauritius ranks 25th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Mauritius: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/mauritius/">Bahamas vs Mauritius: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.