Bahamas vs Equatorial Guinea: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Bahamas
0.0082 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.0086 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
24th
Equatorial Guinea rank
23rd

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.020.040.06200120122023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0086 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0082 hectares per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0004 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 24th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 23rd of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 0.019 hectares per square kilometre 0.0134 hectares per square kilometre 0.0056 hectares per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 0.0087 hectares per square kilometre 0.0229 hectares per square kilometre 0.0142 hectares per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0102 hectares per square kilometre 0.0077 hectares per square kilometre 0.0024 hectares per square kilometre Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Bahamas or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0086 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0082 hectares per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Bahamas and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0004 hectares per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Equatorial Guinea?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 24th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 23rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Equatorial Guinea: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/equatorial-guinea/">Bahamas vs Equatorial Guinea: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.