How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Nicaragua?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Australia vs Nicaragua: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Australia

0.0002 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Nicaragua

0.0001 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Australia rank

140th

Nicaragua rank

143rd

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Australia
Nicaragua

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0002 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.4 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Australia ranks 140th and Nicaragua ranks 143rd of 176 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Australia	Nicaragua	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0005 hectares per square kilometre	0.0005 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	Australia
2010s	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	Australia
2020s	0.0002 hectares per square kilometre	0.0002 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Australia or Nicaragua?: Australia, at 0.0002 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Australia and Nicaragua?: 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Nicaragua?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Australia and Nicaragua rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Australia ranks 140th and Nicaragua ranks 143rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Nicaragua: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/australia/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/australia/nicaragua/">Australia vs Nicaragua: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.