How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Zimbabwe?

19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Armenia vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Armenia

0.0001 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0.0001 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Armenia rank

147th

Zimbabwe rank

146th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Armenia
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre in Armenia, a difference of 0 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Armenia ranks 147th and Zimbabwe ranks 146th of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Armenia	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0002 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	Armenia
2010s	0 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	0 hectares per square kilometre	Zimbabwe
2020s	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	0.0002 hectares per square kilometre	0.0001 hectares per square kilometre	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Armenia or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0001 hectares per square kilometre in Armenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Armenia and Zimbabwe?: 0 hectares per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Zimbabwe?: 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Zimbabwe rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Armenia ranks 147th and Zimbabwe ranks 146th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/armenia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/armenia/zimbabwe/">Armenia vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.