What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Palau?

0.0018 hectares per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Palau?

18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Antigua and Barbuda vs Palau: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda

0.0202 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Palau

0.0184 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Antigua and Barbuda rank

10th

Palau rank

11th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Antigua and Barbuda
Palau

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.0202 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0184 hectares per square kilometre in Palau, a difference of 0.0018 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times Palau's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 10th and Palau ranks 11th of 176 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Antigua and Barbuda	Palau	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0317 hectares per square kilometre	0.0076 hectares per square kilometre	0.0241 hectares per square kilometre	Antigua and Barbuda
2010s	0.0151 hectares per square kilometre	0.0064 hectares per square kilometre	0.0087 hectares per square kilometre	Antigua and Barbuda
2020s	0.0175 hectares per square kilometre	0.0072 hectares per square kilometre	0.0103 hectares per square kilometre	Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Palau?: Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.0202 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0184 hectares per square kilometre in Palau as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Palau?: 0.0018 hectares per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Palau?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Palau rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Antigua and Barbuda ranks 10th and Palau ranks 11th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Palau: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/palau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/palau/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Palau: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.