How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Chile?

23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Angola vs Chile: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Angola

0.0004 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile

0.0004 hectares per square kilometre

in 2023

Angola rank

126th

Chile rank

125th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

Angola
Chile

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0004 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0004 hectares per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 0 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 126th and Chile ranks 125th of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Angola	Chile	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0007 hectares per square kilometre	0.0004 hectares per square kilometre	0.0003 hectares per square kilometre	Angola
2010s	0.0008 hectares per square kilometre	0.0005 hectares per square kilometre	0.0003 hectares per square kilometre	Angola
2020s	0.0003 hectares per square kilometre	0.0005 hectares per square kilometre	0.0002 hectares per square kilometre	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Angola or Chile?: Chile, at 0.0004 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0004 hectares per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Angola and Chile?: 0 hectares per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Chile?: 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Angola and Chile rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?: Angola ranks 126th and Chile ranks 125th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Chile: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/angola/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/angola/chile/">Angola vs Chile: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit: hectares per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.