Togo vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Togo
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Togo rank
139th
Zimbabwe rank
137th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Togo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Togo, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Togo ahead.
Togo ranks 139th and Zimbabwe ranks 137th of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Togo averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Togo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Togo |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Togo or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Togo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Togo and Zimbabwe?
- 0 hectares per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Togo and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Togo and Zimbabwe rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Togo ranks 139th and Zimbabwe ranks 137th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.