South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
South Sudan
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 hectares per person
in 2024
South Sudan rank
134th
Zimbabwe rank
137th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- South Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 134th and Zimbabwe ranks 137th of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0.0001 hectares per person | South Sudan |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- South Sudan, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 0 hectares per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- South Sudan ranks 134th and Zimbabwe ranks 137th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.