Rwanda vs East Timor: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Rwanda
0 hectares per person
in 2024
East Timor
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Rwanda rank
129th
East Timor rank
126th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Rwanda
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.5 times Rwanda's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 129th and East Timor ranks 126th of 176 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | East Timor |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | East Timor |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Rwanda or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Rwanda and East Timor?
- 0 hectares per person, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and East Timor?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and East Timor rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Rwanda ranks 129th and East Timor ranks 126th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.