Palau vs Sweden: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Palau
0.0001 hectares per person
in 2024
Sweden
0.0001 hectares per person
in 2024
Palau rank
23rd
Sweden rank
20th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Palau
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0.0001 hectares per person against 0.0001 hectares per person in Palau, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Palau's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Palau ahead.
Palau ranks 23rd and Sweden ranks 20th of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Palau averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Palau | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0002 hectares per person | 0.0002 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.0002 hectares per person | 0.0002 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.0002 hectares per person | 0.0002 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Palau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Palau or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0.0001 hectares per person against 0.0001 hectares per person in Palau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Palau and Sweden?
- 0 hectares per person, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Sweden?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Palau and Sweden rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Palau ranks 23rd and Sweden ranks 20th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.