Nigeria vs Peru: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Nigeria
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Peru
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Nigeria rank
100th
Peru rank
102nd
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Nigeria
- Peru
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Peru, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Nigeria ahead.
Nigeria ranks 100th and Peru ranks 102nd of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Nigeria or Peru?
- Nigeria, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Nigeria and Peru?
- 0 hectares per person, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Peru?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Nigeria and Peru rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Nigeria ranks 100th and Peru ranks 102nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.