What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Namibia and Palestine?

0 hectares per person, with Palestine ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Palestine?

8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Namibia vs Palestine: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita

Namibia

0 hectares per person

in 2024

Palestine

0 hectares per person

in 2024

Namibia rank

164th

Palestine rank

162nd

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time

Namibia
Palestine

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Namibia, a difference of 0 hectares per person.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 164th and Palestine ranks 162nd of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Namibia	Palestine	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	Palestine
2010s	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	Palestine
2020s	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Namibia or Palestine?: Palestine, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Namibia and Palestine?: 0 hectares per person, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Palestine?: 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
How do Namibia and Palestine rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?: Namibia ranks 164th and Palestine ranks 162nd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Palestine: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-capita/namibia/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-capita/namibia/west-bank-and-gaza/">Namibia vs Palestine: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Unit: hectares per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,995 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.