What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Moldova and Zimbabwe?

0 hectares per person, with Moldova ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Zimbabwe?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Moldova vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita

Moldova

0 hectares per person

in 2024

Zimbabwe

0 hectares per person

in 2024

Moldova rank

135th

Zimbabwe rank

137th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time

Moldova
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 hectares per person.

That makes Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Moldova ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 137th of 176 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Moldova	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	Zimbabwe
2010s	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	Zimbabwe
2020s	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	0 hectares per person	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Moldova or Zimbabwe?: Moldova, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Moldova and Zimbabwe?: 0 hectares per person, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Zimbabwe?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Moldova and Zimbabwe rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?: Moldova ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 137th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Moldova vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-capita/moldova/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-capita/moldova/zimbabwe/">Moldova vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Unit: hectares per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 3,995 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.