Libya vs Palestine: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Libya
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Palestine
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Libya rank
159th
Palestine rank
162nd
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Libya
- Palestine
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Palestine, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
That makes Libya's figure about 2.1 times Palestine's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 159th and Palestine ranks 162nd of 176 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Palestine |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Palestine |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Libya or Palestine?
- Libya, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Palestine as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Libya and Palestine?
- 0 hectares per person, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Palestine?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Palestine rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Libya ranks 159th and Palestine ranks 162nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.