Libya vs Pakistan: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Libya
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0 hectares per person
in 2024
Libya rank
159th
Pakistan rank
161st
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Libya
- Pakistan
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Pakistan, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.9 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 159th and Pakistan ranks 161st of 176 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Libya |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Libya |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Libya or Pakistan?
- Libya, at 0 hectares per person against 0 hectares per person in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Libya and Pakistan?
- 0 hectares per person, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Pakistan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Pakistan rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Libya ranks 159th and Pakistan ranks 161st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.