Jamaica vs Palau: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita
Jamaica
0.0001 hectares per person
in 2024
Palau
0.0001 hectares per person
in 2024
Jamaica rank
21st
Palau rank
23rd
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita over time
- Jamaica
- Palau
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0.0001 hectares per person against 0.0001 hectares per person in Palau, a difference of 0 hectares per person.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Palau ahead.
Jamaica ranks 21st and Palau ranks 23rd of 176 countries.
Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0002 hectares per person | 0.0002 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Palau |
| 2010s | 0.0002 hectares per person | 0.0002 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Palau |
| 2020s | 0.0001 hectares per person | 0.0002 hectares per person | 0 hectares per person | Palau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita, Jamaica or Palau?
- Jamaica, at 0.0001 hectares per person against 0.0001 hectares per person in Palau as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita between Jamaica and Palau?
- 0 hectares per person, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Palau?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Jamaica and Palau rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita?
- Jamaica ranks 21st and Palau ranks 23rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.